# Contact (/docs/about/contact)

---
type: Document
title: Contact
description: How to reach Raza Rizwan, what to bring to a first conversation, and what happens in a workflow audit.
status: stable
order: 6
generated: { by: "process:claude-code", at: 2026-08-27T09:00:00Z }
verified:
  - { by: "human:rrizwan98", at: 2026-08-28T14:00:00Z }
ksor:
  audience: [public]
  owner: human:rrizwan98
  approval: { by: "human:rrizwan98", at: 2026-08-27T09:30:00Z }
trust_tier: human-reviewed
build_id: sha256:d9f989bee8fa4c15cf0f7f1572f9e9a18305ef4e2ce0c3cfb6a5a421ead6dc1d
dirty: true
---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| Email | rrizwan1998@gmail.com |
| WhatsApp | +92 303 2206662 |
| GitHub | [github.com/rrizwan98](https://github.com/rrizwan98) |
| LinkedIn | [linkedin.com/in/raza-rizwan98](https://www.linkedin.com/in/raza-rizwan98/) |
| Based in | Karachi, Pakistan; works with teams anywhere |

## What to bring

One workflow where a person still babysits the AI, or still does the whole job
by hand. The more ordinary and repetitive it is, the better it works as a first
project. Useful to say in the first message:

- what the job is, and what a finished result looks like
- who does it today, and how often
- which tools it passes through
- where a person must keep the final say

## What happens first

A workflow audit. The current process is mapped step by step, the human steps
are counted, the highest-value automation point is identified, and success is
defined. It ends with a recommendation: whether a focused pilot is worth
building, and what it would cover. If the answer is that automation is not
worth it for that workflow, the audit says so.

## What comes after, if it is worth it

Pilot, then production, then optimization, each earning the next. The four
moves are described on [how I work](how-i-work.md).

## What is not discussed in public

The internals of systems built for clients or for a company: architecture,
prompts, agent names, client names, the technology inside a delivered system.
Those belong in a conversation under the client's own terms, not on a website.